Relationships between functional and structural corticospinal tract integrity and walking post stroke.

Jayaram G
Stagg CJ
Esser P
Kischka U
Stinear J
Johansen-Berg H
Scientific Abstract

Studies on upper limb recovery following stroke have highlighted the importance of the structural and functional integrity of the corticospinal tract (CST) in determining clinical outcomes. However, such relationships have not been fully explored for the lower limb. We aimed to test whether variation in walking impairment was associated with variation in the structural or functional integrity of the CST.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to stimulate each motor cortex while EMG recordings were taken from the vastus lateralis (VL) bilaterally; these EMG measures were used to calculate both ipsilateral and contralateral recruitment curves for each lower limb. The slope of these recruitment curves was used to examine the strength of functional connectivity from the motor cortex in each hemisphere to the lower limbs in chronic stroke patients and to calculate a ratio between ipsilateral and contralateral outputs referred to as the functional connectivity ratio (FCR). The structural integrity of the CST was assessed using diffusion tensor MRI to measure the asymmetry in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the internal capsule. Lower limb impairment and walking speed were also measured.

The FCR for the paretic leg correlated with walking impairment, such that greater relative ipsilateral connectivity was associated with slower walking speeds. Asymmetrical FA values, reflecting reduced structural integrity of the lesioned CST, were associated with greater walking impairment. FCR and FA asymmetry were strongly positively correlated with each other.

Patients with relatively greater ipsilateral connectivity between the contralesional motor cortex and the paretic lower limb were more behaviorally impaired and had more structural damage to their ipsilesional hemisphere CST.

Measures of structural and functional damage may be useful in the selection of therapeutic strategies, allowing for more tailored and potentially more beneficial treatments.

Citation

2012. Clin Neurophysiol, 123(12):2422-8.

DOI
10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.026
Related Content
Publication
Torrecillos F, Falato E, Pogosyan A, West TO, Di Lazzaro V, Brown P
2020. J. Neurosci., 40(2):369-381.
Publication
Garas FN, Kormann E, Shah RS, Vinciati F, Smith Y, Magill PJ, Sharott A
2018. J. Comp. Neurol., 526(5):877-898.
Publication
Moeller M, Grohn J, Manohar S, Bogacz R

2021. PLoS Comput Biol, 17(7)e1009213.

Publication
Muthuraman M, Bange M, Koirala N, Ciolac D, Pintea B, Glaser M, Tinkhauser G, Brown P, Deuschl G, Groppa S
2020. Brain, 143(11):3393-3407.